The Digital Footprints of Tech’s Most Powerful Women

What is PeekScore?: PeekScore is a rank from 1 to 10, assigned to every person. The higher someone’s score, the “more important” they are on the web. In calculating your PeekScore and updating it often, PeekYou takes into account your known presence and activity on the Internet, including but not limited to; your blogging, participation in social networks, the number of your friends, followers, or readers, the amount of web content you create, and your prominence in the news. For first time visitors a more in-depth explanation of what the PeekScore is, and how to increase your own, can be found by clicking through here.

As we’ve written here in the PeekScore blog previously – such as here, for example – “If we’re to live in a world where we choose to have leaders, by our math a little over half of them (at all levels, and in all areas) should be women. We realize that rightfully the balance may shift back and forth over time (just given the pool of available, qualified, and/or interested candidates at any moment), but on average – considering the demographic breakdown of those being led – it seems that this is how things should shake out.”

While we avoid politics here at the blog, this is one point of view we don’t regard as controversial. Women in positions of power are much more common than once upon a time, but we hope to see a day where there’s no novelty to the notion whatsoever. Nonetheless, at this moment, women in positions of leadership and/or great influence do warrant special notice. Today we’re taking a look at the most powerful and influential women in the world most dear to the heart of PeekYou, the world of technology. We’re not measuring the scope of their significances, nor the quality of their accomplishments, but we’re seeing how they measure up in terms of their presences and impacts here on the Web (i.e., their digital footprints, an explanation of which can be found above, or more in-depth by clicking through here).

Any thoughts on the above? Any women in tech you’d like to have seen included on the list? Let us know in the comments.

Rank Picture Name Title, Company PeekScore
1

Meg Whitman President and CEO, HP 8.98 / 10.00
2

Sheryl Sandberg COO, Facebook 8.34 / 10.00
3

Marissa Mayer VP of Location and Local Services, Google 8.22 / 10.00
4

Susan Wojcicki SVP of Advertising, Google 8.00 / 10.00
5

Ursula Burns CEO, Xerox 7.89 / 10.00
6

Safra Catz President, Oracle 7.80 / 10.00
7

Cher Wang Co-founder and chairperson, HTC 7.68 / 10.00
8

Virginia “Ginni” Rometty CEO and President, IBM 7.60 / 10.00
9

Ellen Kullman CEO, DuPont 7.32 / 10.00
10

Katie Jacobs Stanton Head of International Strategy, Twitter 7.20 / 10.00

PeekScore Competitions: Fashion Designers, Under 40 vs. Over 65

What is PeekScore?: PeekScore is a rank from 1 to 10, assigned to every person. The higher someone’s score, the “more important” they are on the web. In calculating your PeekScore and updating it often, PeekYou takes into account your known presence and activity on the Internet, including but not limited to; your blogging, participation in social networks, the number of your friends, followers, or readers, the amount of web content you create, and your prominence in the news. For first time visitors a more in-depth explanation of what the PeekScore is, and how to increase your own, can be found by clicking through here.

While competition is the crucial engine driving industry – and some might argue that it’s what inspires all human progress – the “competition” being staged here isn’t driving much of anything meaningful, and is purely for show and to cater to our whim and your amusement. If we were to put the twenty unbearably fabulous women and men listed below in a room together, while they may not have much time for us – the comparative slobs who run the PeekScore blog (and apparently this hypothetical room into which we’d be putting them) – we suspect they’d get along with each other, at least to one another’s faces, more or less fine.

Very recently we took a look at the fashion designers with the highest PeekScores of all. The response to that list was extremely enthusiastic, so – forever interested in giving you good people what you want, as we’ve got a business to run here – we’ve decided to hybridize that previously, foolishly underused PeekScore avenue (fashion) with our introduced, but yet to be exhaustively explored PeekScore Competitions concept (a concept which was also met with a positive response from our readership). This time around, as with last time, it’s a “youngsters vs. veterans” competition; again exploring, in a terribly unscientific way, the notion that social media’s generation gap may not translate to all quarters and industries. But this time we’ve pitted two groupings with a quarter century separating them at the very least, and somewhere in the neighborhood of over 60 years at most; fashion designers, young vs. (um) not quite so young.

Our young designers are not all newcomers, strictly speaking, nor are they all upstarts. Some have been around for quite a few seasons now and are well known. But they are all under 40 which, as it is the new 30, means that they’re all under (new) middle-age. On the other hand our veterans are all, technically speaking, senior citizens (in the “bus pass” and “half-price movies” sense), as – no matter the degrees to which many are still quite actively designing and running their businesses – they all exceed 65.

So, enough jibber jabber, let’s get down to it and see what our young designers are made of here in cyberspace.


FASHION DESINGNERS, AGES 40 AND UNDER:

Rank Picture Name Age PeekScore
1

Prabal Gurung
37
9.10 / 10
2

Alexander Wang
27
9.09 / 10
3

Sarah Burton
36
9.09 / 10
4

Zac Posen
30
8.29 / 10
5

Phillip Lim
38
8.20 / 10
6

Jason Wu
28
8.20 / 10
7

Ashley Olsen
25
8.05 / 10
8

Kira Plastinina
19
7.59 / 10
9

Joseph Altuzarra
27
6.76 / 10
10

Christopher Kane
29
5.59 / 10

AVERAGE PEEKSCORE: 8.00

Curiously, given what we know of both the proclivities of our society’s younger folks, and of the realities of commercial ventures in the modern western world, this is not the most wired-in group of individuals you could ever come across. They may be forward-thinking and hip in many senses, but only about half of them seem to have truly handed themselves over to a rich online existence (for either themselves, personally, or their labels). The fellow at number one is present enough here in cyberspace to have ranked a spot on our Fashion Designers with the Highest PeekScores list, and two others (Sarah Burton and Alexander Wang) would have made that list had we compiled it today, but the remainder – no matter the degree of their name recognition, or success in the press, or even at retail – fell a bit short of that.

But, our elegant and gracefully aged (depending upon your definition of grace) veterans have not yet been analyzed, so let’s not count the youngsters out just yet. Let’s see how our living legends hold up.


FASHION DESIGNERS, AGES 65 AND UP:

Rank Picture Name Age PeekScore
1

Betsey Johnson
68
9.99 / 10
2

Calvin Klein
68
9.99 / 10
3

Karl Lagerfeld
77
9.88 / 10
4

Vivienne Westwood
70
8.37 / 10
5

Giorgio Armani
77
8.21 / 10
6

Ralph Lauren
71
7.83 / 10
7

Valentino Garavani
79
7.01 / 10
8

Hubert de Givenchy
84
7.00 / 10
9

Oscar de la Renta
79
6.92 / 10
10

Paul Smith
65
6.54 / 10

AVERAGE PEEKSCORE: 8.17

Well, it would seem – as with our last list of this nature – that the older folks did win. It was close, but experience did equal victory; even if that analysis is hardly fair.

Now, in the interest of facts, it must be acknowledged that these older designers are not all by any means the ones personally updating their Twitters, and Facebooks, and what-have-yous (some, we suspect, may do it some of the time). Why, our number 3 was unwittingly on the record as recently as just this last fall confirming that he has no idea what the heck Facebook is. But they’re successful and quite well-known companies bear their names, and the online presence of those names – which in many cases is considerable – will rightfully influence their PeekScores.

Was it a fair fight? Not really. We pitted international superstars against people mostly best known only in fashion circles.

What have we learned? First and foremost, that PeekScores do what they’re supposed to do, and accurately measure an individual’s impact in cyberspace. We learned, honestly, that as of right now – regardless of whether or not the designers themselves are the impetus for this prominence – the veterans are doing a better job of having their presence felt here on the public web.

And, well, we learned how each of the above designers, only a few of whom were covered on our last list, are doing in the digital footprint department, and we think – particularly to those who care about fashion – that might be pretty interesting in and of itself.

…and things that go bump in the ‘net: The Digital Footrpints of the World’s Most Prominent (Living) Horror Filmmakers

What is PeekScore?: PeekScore is a rank from 1 to 10, assigned to every person. The higher someone’s score, the “more important” they are on the web. In calculating your PeekScore and updating it often, PeekYou takes into account your known presence and activity on the Internet, including but not limited to; your blogging, participation in social networks, the number of your friends, followers, or readers, the amount of web content you create, and your prominence in the news. For first time visitors a more in-depth explanation of what the PeekScore is, and how to increase your own, can be found by clicking through here.

With Halloween upon us – and the young people’s attentions turning to thoughts of ghoulies, goblins, black vans, and Whatchamacallits – we figured the time was prime for a list of this nature…

In truth, today’s exercise in PeekScorery was inspired by a recent discussion of the degree to which it’s often the case that artists involved in somewhat niche and/or “cult” concerns will lead a more robust online existence than celebrities with greater mainstream name recognition. This makes perfect sense, as the Internet revealed itself a long time ago now as an extraordinary tool for rallying and uniting, from far-flung locales, the like-minded of specific and esoteric interests, so that they might gather on message boards, social media hubs, and newsgroups, and contentiously bicker incessantly over the finer points of what are supposed to be mutual loves and interests. Indeed, this is one of the activities that many, to this day, most closely associate with the ‘net. Artists whose breads are primarily buttered by those lonely, sweaty souls prone to such futile, fannish in-fighting are wise to go straight to the source in promoting their wares.

We here at the PeekScore blog are big fans of horror films, and all manner of “feel bad” cinema, and are quite guilty of the type of bickering mentioned above when it comes to the same (our bickering is only made marginally less sad for our doing it face to face, but made all the more troubling due to the possibility that the staff of the PeekScore blog may actually consist of only one guy). We decided to marry this love of deliberately unpleasant films to our livelihoods, and see how the genre’s biggest names measure up on the PeekScore scale.

The list could have been quite a lot longer. While the PeekScores are impartial, the process by which we selected the names, it could be argued (or insisted), was somewhat subjective. We urge you to comment and yell at us about who we neglected to include. We will even bait you into commenting by suggesting that many hardcore horror fans are a bit disturbing and worrisome (terms such as “mouth-breather,” “maladjusted,” “sociopath,” and “mother’s basement” spring to mind). We’ll leave it at this for now, perhaps to revisit this subject later, but please do chime in.

Rank Picture Name Bio PeekScore
1

Rob Zombie We now just take for granted that Zombie is one of the better known horror filmmakers working today, but – come on – how weird is it that he is? Regardless, while we’re not the hugest fans of all his films, The Devil’s Rejects is a quite solid and sufficiently upsetting effort. 8.75 / 10.00
2

Wes Craven While best known for his creation of Freddy Krueger and the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise, and likely best paid for his association with the Scream films, we can live with his nearing the top of this list given the still unspeakably (nearly unconscionably) harrowing and depraved The Last House on the Left, and the atmospheric and brutalThe Hills Have Eyes. 39 and 34 years later, respectively, these two films can still ruin your week. 8.70 / 10.00
3

David Cronenberg A master at creating a very specific, and profoundly uncomfortable sort of anxiety, and once quite adept at being rather famously gross as well. While he abandoned prosthetics, goop and grue a while back, for the most part, to pursue a classier and more earthbound style, he still treads nearly exclusively in intense areas. He’s great and singular, and there’s not much else to add. 8.61 / 10
4

John Carpenter A genre legend. It’s been a long while since he’s made something badass, but the original Halloween is very possibly better than you remember. The Thing, on the other hand, is every bit as good as you remember (as you likely remember it as being awesome). Also, while not horror, Escape from New York still stands as one of the best and most compulsively watchable action films ever made. J.C. is no joke. 8.48 / 10.00
5

George Romero While we wish he’d stop making increasingly hamfistedly allegorical and didactic “Dead” films, the original trilogy still stands as masterful; not just within the context of “horror,” but simply within the grand scheme of all cinema. Great flicks such as The Crazies, Martin, and Creepshow only further cement the guy’s license to wait out the remainder of his career wallowing in mediocrity, if he so chooses. He’s got nothing to prove to us. 8.47 / 10.00
6

Eli Roth While his evangelical efforts on behalf of horror, and his unapologetic love of the genre and being a director within it, are admirable, his films have largely left us cold. His work is impossibly violent, but somehow slick and antiseptic at the same time. He seems a likable and bright enough guy, and surely he’s a capable craftsman. We suspect that – whether he’ll ever make it or not – there’s a decent film in him somewhere. 8.40 / 10.00
7

Dario Argento Incoherent, incomprehensible, ridiculous, stupid, disorienting, colorful, exciting, stunning, beautiful; all adjectives you’ll hear/read aptly attached to this guy’s frequently breathtakingly gorgeous body of waking nightmares and nearly stream of consciousness murder mysteries and supernatural thrillers. Sure, it’s been about 26 years since he’s made a genuinely good film, but – similar to others on this list – you make even one Suspiria, Inferno, or Deep Red, and you’ve earned the right to rest on your laurels and make as many unwatchable films as you please. His unassailable legacy was carved in stone decades ago. 8.37 / 10
8

Roger Corman Amongst all the talk of Corman the businessman, producer, distributor, and raconteur, sometimes the fact that he was a very good filmmaker gets lost. Stylish, brooding, and atmospheric flicks such as Tomb of Ligeia and The Masque of the Red Death – associated by some of us with nothing so much as New York television’s decades-ago canceled The 4:30 Movie – still hold up as legitimately unsettling and moody masterpieces. 8.36 / 10
9

Takashi Miike Again, hardly a horror filmmaker in any true sense, his body of work nonetheless contains many horrifying films. Not only famously one of the most prolific, but also simply one of the greatest filmmakers working today. This narrow space could not accommodate the gushing, so we’ll move on. 8.30 / 10
10

James Wan In addition to co-creating the incredibly lucrative, and astoundingly silly Saw juggernaut, he also brought us the somewhat irritating, “jump scare”-happy carnival attraction that is this year’s good, but overrated, Insidious. 8.23 / 10
11

Alejandro Jodorowsky Not a horror director at all, we know, although his brilliant Santa Sangre arguably qualifies. We’ve included him here because he has definitely been influential to the genre, and even more so because he’s a genius. He’s no spring chicken, and we’re not sure of how many chances to include him in PeekScore lists we’ll get. 8.22 / 10
12

Alexandre Aja His nearly great Haute Tension was assed up by an unnecessary and infuriating twist ending, which didn’t play at all fair. But his (gratuitous on paper) remake of The Hills Have Eyes was surprisingly terrific. 8.16 / 10
13

James Gunn Gunn (who, like many on this list, is hardly strictly a horror filmmaker) is truly someone who has increased his profile through the use of his personal website and social media, and making himself incredibly accessible to fans online. While he has had some tremendous success as a screenwriter of mainstream films, as a director his work has been purely cult, genre stuff. His use of the internet to get his work to the people who would appreciate it best is impressive. 8.15 / 10
14

Neil Marshall He’s revealed himself to be more of a genre pastiche director – with each film a hyper-violent tribute to a different type of film he’d grown up loving – than a proper horror director, but The Descent scared the hell out of us, when very little does. So, for that alone, he’s on this list. 8.13 / 10
15

Takashi Shimizu For a period of time that whole “contorted little kids wearing white face, with long black wigs and mouths full of black goop” thing seemed fairly in vogue. Most of us have never seen these films because they look stupid, but we figured at least one representative of this very popular genre of Japanese cinema (and American remakes) should be represented. 8.08 / 10
16

Ruggero Deodato This lunatic is best known for directing the oft cited, and legitimately shocking, Cannibal Holocaust, and the vile and nihilistic The House on the Edge of the Park. 8.04 / 10
17

Pascal Laugier The French director of 2008′s ridiculously pretentious, and insanely gruesome Martyrs, which is surprisingly to have a Hollywood remake soon. His Hollywood debut, The Tall Man is to come out later this year. We’re trying to keep an open mind. 8.03 / 10
18

Alexandre Bustillo He, in collaboration with Julien Maury (directly below), directed 2007′s amazingly bleak and brutal (and brutally, bleakly amazing) À l’intérieur (English titleInside); which is, in our opinion, one of the very best pure horror films to come out in years and years. (Warning: If you’re pregnant, or even thinking of becoming pregnant, do not even Google the film.) 8.00 / 10.00
18

Julien Maury Co-directed 2007′s À l’intérieur (English title Inside) with his buddy Monsieur Bustillo above. After being courted by Hollywood – and attached in the press to a film or two there, which ultimately resulted in nothing – they wound up returning to France to finally make their incredible debut’s follow-up. Titled Livid, the film debuted at the Toronto International Film Festival in September, and is to be released here in the states next year. 8.00 / 10.00
19

Jee-woon Kim While not strictly a horror director at all, as is the case with most on this list, films such as the brilliant A Tale of Two Sisters are close enough to justify our including him here. 7.79 / 10
20

Jos√© Mojica Marins If you’ve not seen the Brazilian Zé do Caixão (roughly translated from Portuguese to Coffin Joe) films, then you are in for a treat. His flicks – the two best known of which are At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul, and This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse – are ambitious, zero budget affairs, abundant in imagination and a queasy, blasphemous, dark-hearted surrealism which finds them often suggesting almost a sort of shoestring, drive-in Jodorowsky or Buñuel. They stand as testaments to how boundless imagination can trump money, or even technical skill, where art is concerned. 7.19 / 10
21

Herschell Gordon Lewis When the government cracked down on the “nudies” he and his producer – the legendary, late David F. Friedman – were making to turn a quick profit, the two had to figure out a new, tawdry attraction to exploit. They settled upon sickening violence and gore, which to that point (the early 60s) had never really been seen in cinema. In the view of some, a dubious innovation, surely. Nonetheless, the man is a legend, and his films gloriously terrible, yet self-aware entertainments which harken back to a more innocent time (and the joys of shocking the hell out of it). 7.07 / 10

The PeekScores of 20 of the Most Powerful Venture Capitalists

What is PeekScore?: PeekScore is a rank from 1 to 10, assigned to every person. The higher someone’s score, the “more important” they are on the web. In calculating your PeekScore and updating it often, PeekYou takes into account your known presence and activity on the Internet, including but not limited to; your blogging, participation in social networks, the number of your friends, followers, or readers, the amount of web content you create, and your prominence in the news.

Are you a hardworking, entrepreneurial visionary, with a big, fat crazy idea? Do you believe that this earth-shattering idea of yours – this strange and forward thinking contraption, this unlikely service, or this bold, new business model – could make a boatload of money for a lucky investor, if only he or she had the foresight and the guts? Well, calm down Mr./Ms. Visionary. We’re not offering, nor are we the sorts from whom you should be seeking help for that kind of thing. But you know who might be able to help you out? Venture capitalists – those fearless, moneyed folks, forever seeking to become more so by tossing their cash, hand over fist, at high-risk startups which they view as possessing tremendous potential to find them all the more moneyed still by day’s end.

Below is a list of 20 of the most powerful venture capitalists in America ranked by their PeekScores. If you are an entrepreneur or inventor – as outlined above – we’re not sure of how such a list will be of use to you, but we think it’s pretty cool.

Rank Picture Name Company PeekScore
1

Fred Wilson Union Square Ventures 9.13 / 10
2

Reid Hoffman Greylock Partners 9.06 / 10
3

Peter Barris New Enterprise Associates 8.21 / 10
4

Michael Moritz Sequoia Capital 8.21 / 10
5

Jim Breyer Accel Partners 8.17 / 10
6

Marc Andreessen Andreessen Horowitz 8.10 / 10
7

Peter Thiel Founders Fund 8.08 / 10
8



Peter Fenton Benchmark Capital 8.06 / 10
9

Josh Kopelman First Round Capital 8.03 / 10
10



Scott Sandell New Enterprise Associates 8.00 / 10
11

David Skok Matrix Partners 7.91 / 10
12

Kevin Efrusy Accel Partners 7.65 / 10
13

David Sze Greylock Partners 7.55 / 10
14

Jeremy Levine Bessemer Venture Partners 7.13 / 10
15

Douglas Leone Sequoia Capital 6.69 / 10
16



Joel Cutler General Catalyst Partners 6.36 / 10
17

Sean Dalton Highland Capital Partners 6.15 / 10
18

Harry Weller New Enterprise Associates 6.11 / 10
19

Terry McGuire Polaris Venture Capital 5.49 / 10
20

Bob Goodman Bessemer Venture Partners 5.32 / 10

The Digital Footprints of the Year’s Highest Paid Musical Acts

What is PeekScore?: PeekScore is a rank from 1 to 10, assigned to every person. The higher someone’s score, the “more important” they are on the web. In calculating your PeekScore and updating it often, PeekYou takes into account your known presence and activity on the Internet, including but not limited to; your blogging, participation in social networks, the number of your friends, followers, or readers, the amount of web content you create, and your prominence in the news.

The music industry may be in a bit of a shambles in recent years, but try telling that to the ten folks listed below; each of whom fell asleep last night on a pile of money and awoke this morning on a different, bigger pile of money. They earn their keep (and oh boy, do they!) making with the tunes, even while the record labels scramble and panic, and we civilians come to regard recorded music on demand as something akin to running water.

Forbes has lately been blessing we of the (at least relatively) broke and curious class with their annual “top paid” lists for this profession or that, and just a few weeks ago bestowed upon us mere fiscal mortals their list of the year’s highest paid musicians. As we’ve done previously with other such lists – and will likely do until there’s no internet left for us to do it upon/within – we’ve arranged these fabulous popsters not by their heights, weights, ages, or numbers of records sold, but according to the sizes of their digital footprints as measured upon our handy, dandy PeekScore scale.

Ms. Germanotta, unsurprisingly, tops our list. Sir Macca, only slightly more surprisingly – until you think about it for even five seconds – holds strong at number 2. The vocalist for the year’s biggest money makers, even for all his global fame and import, just hasn’t left his mark here in cyberspace in the way many of his less well financially rewarded peers have, and lurks shadily at the list’s bottom. We can’t say that we mind the internet being a reasonably Bono-light zone, but we know we don’t speak for all.

Talk to us in the comments section. Complain or praise us. Tell us what you think of Gaga, Elton, Bono, or whomever. Just say hello.

Rank Picture Name Earnings for Last
Year
PeekScore
1

Lady Gaga $90 million 10.00 / 10
2

Paul McCartney $67 million 10.00 / 10
3

Dave Matthews (for The Dave Matthews Band) $51 million 10.00 / 10
4

Elton John $100 million 10.00 / 10
5

Justin Bieber $53 million 10.00 / 10
6

will.i.am (for The Black Eyed Peas) $61 million 9.63 / 10
7

Michael Bublé $70 million 9.01 / 10
8

Jon Bon Jovi (for Bon Jovi) $125 million 8.98 / 10
9

Don Henley (for The Eagles) $60 million 8.80 / 10
10

Bono (for U2) $195 million 8.40 / 10